I find it slightly incredible that someone who works for Google feels that they can state "RSS is effectively dead." in the latest thread about the public outcry around Google killing RSS in one of their products.
Google killing off Reader was the single event that started the "Killed by Google" meme. Every time Google removes RSS from something there's stories and threads all over the tech press, HN, Reddit, etc. What is it about RSS in particular, but also tech in general, that makes Googlers incapable of listening to the what people are telling them?
Google's support for RSS is effectively dead, because Googlers actively want to kill it. Maybe you'll succeed. I wouldn't celebrate that if I worked for Google.
"Data driven decision making." The real death of any piece of proprietary or centrally maintained software is the addition of telemetry. The actual death comes much later.
When something like this "just works" it's easy to fall victim to the belief that it's irrelevant, but that's just because it exists in the background.
I sincerely hope you will not remove RSS support because it's an easy way to monitor publicly visible updates from all kinds of sites without needing to implement their APIs. I've got a bot that monitors Youtube accounts via RSS and posts updates to a Discord. Writing the code took only about a half hour because parsing RSS feeds is literally a single call to a library.
To me, RSS/Atom is one of the original promises of the web: a freely accessible network of information from all over the world in a standardized open format that anyone can use. Takes practically zero time to implement because libraries will do the work for you. @intenttoship is already lamenting the fact they're going to have to write a screen scraper now.
I assume you mean this in context of Google groups, because otherwise it seems RSS is doing OK. I mean, there's that whole podcasts thing and whatnot
So, when I work at Google, I don't see any mention of RSS anywhere. It just isn't a thing users would demand. There might be semi-forgotten API endpoints here and there. But I assure you - when the server inevitably gets hit by some deprecation or its team gets reorged enough, it will be rewritten. And the rewrite will almost surely not have such an endpoint, simply because nobody will ever think of it. No vendetta, just lifecycle.
Hi, user here. RSS is absolutely something that I would demand, if I could.
A world with policies based on the median is a dystopia.
But trivially so: "No, we only sell mid-sized shoes, aren't you supposed to be at the top of the bell curve"?
We are supposed to running towards the good extreme tail of the bell curve.
Median guy does not use the tools you use - it's another world completely, and it's not your world.
Dialogue with a village librarian: "You should acquire more journalism on AI" // "Disgust, usrs demand novels" // "Yeah, current concentration of importance is more towards AI".
[edit]: a missing -s
Translation: Google is killing RSS in its products so you have to either go to their ad/tracker infested sites, or download an app geared towards tracking and spying on you for the purpose of advertisement; and pretending this means RSS is dead.
Using my experience from a Polish university from a field of study focused on computer science: Most of my acquaintances know what RSS is. Several of them use it, and way more at least tried. Granted, it is not something nearly as popular as Facebook, Discord or other similar software, but to say no one know exactly what RSS is seems unlikely to me. Maybe it is simply a situation around your peers? Seeing that even Vivaldi browser added built-in RSS support lately, it seems that people that remember RSS are still common enough.
Yeah-yeah, that’s the attitude.
Most of the people working on software these days barely know what a memory allocator is. Memory allocators are dead.
Frankly spoken, it's really fascinating how ignorant this former inovator-company has become about the world.
This you?
https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/20/google_rss_chrome_and...