Hacker News Reader

Comment by marcodiego | Hacker News Reader

Yes, not news but definitely interesting. Some of these old unixes were only available for multi-thousand dollar machines. Current computers are powerful enough to run these systems somewhat comfortably inside emulators or using JIT or dynamic binary translation...

If 30 years ago you dreamed on using any of those systems, now you can do it.

View on HN

On the other hand, the only real reason you’d want to run AIX is because you had to, because you had the hardware and there was no other option.

I worked with AIX on Power5/5+ (mid 2000s) and their hypervisor for LPARs and what they called micro-LPARs at the time was astonishingly good. It provided very nice granularity and control for running multiple LPARs. An LPAR is like a VM, but is closer to bare-metal than what you find in an Intel environment. You had to allocate at least 1/10th of a virtual processor per LPAR. They had something called 'entitled capacity' where you could specify the minimum amount of CPU allocation the LPAR would get even if all LPARs running on the same hardware were running 100% busy at the same time.

It all worked exactly as advertised. I was on a small team that did performance monitoring, optimizations, and capacity planning and we watched the metrics very closely for production workloads (running DB2). It was seriously impressive.

LPARs -- "Logical Partitions"

I know the industry is full of technical jargon, but IBM is its own universe that pre-dates all of it.

Are LPARs like virtual machines, or like FreeBSD jails (which are like Docker containers, I think)? I get the impression that LPARs are full virtual machines -- each one could be running a different kernel as well as userland.

It's more like virtual machines. You had to use PowerVM, which would take care of virtual I/O, memory, cpu and network. You were able to split in micro partitions and do live partition migrations. In those LPARs you could then use WPARs, which was more like FreeBSD Jails and Solaris Zones. You had two options for it: application wpars and system wpars. I've used AIX[with all hw ecosystem] for many years as a main driver in a bank, and it was ahead of everything else in the market. Still brings good memories - loved it.

LPARs are like full VMs on POWER/AIX, they run atop the Power VM hypervisor

https://developer.ibm.com/articles/cl-hypervisorcompare-powe...

100% agree they always have worked in my experience too, still have the pleasure of occasional use of POWER7/8. I always recommended POWER/AIX for reliable compute where budget and s/w compatibility allowed.

I can confirm. I worked at an AIX and Linux shop for about 4 years in the early 2000's. We had a couple of "enterprise" customers who didn't yet trust Linux for their critical applications. It was IBM all the way.

Note, that for that era, AIX was a very solid choice. Only other real option was Sun/Solaris, which was dying after the dot-com implosion.

I think AIX 5L is what provided RS/6000 owners and developers an offramp to Linux.

I enjoy posts like this because they’re true to a “hacker” mindset: Implementing an unconventional approach - either for use or novelty.

Thinking outside of the box, while a cliche these days was clearly done here. Who else wakes up and thinks, “I wonder if I could run Aix on an M1?” :)

As a young nerd, I heard many times more than once “AIX” pronounced “aches”. Deliberately, mind you.

Or just for the fun of it as a hobbyist.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com