Until it proves too expensive, then a different AI system will do it instead. I have zero faith that it'll be a fully competent, well trained, well rested, well paid person will actually be doing these reviews in the long run.
I mean, seriously, you're assuming as beyond obvious something that's demonstrably wrong RIGHT NOW.
So no, under the proposed implementation (and current judicial requirements in the west) robots dispatching armed police to kill pets or people without ANY human oversight because of a situation that is not time sensitive is mere fantasy.
Don’t misunderstand, I am against this whole thing for the reasons many others have well articulated in this thread.
But the claim that robots are dispatching armed police without any human interference RIGHT NOW is provably wrong.
Show me one incident where this has happened already and I will donate $100 to the charity of your choice.
And yes, the judicial rules and Apples implementation could change in the future. That’s certainly a risk but is not the case RIGHT NOW. I mean, seriously?
Especially since anything flagged by this system is manually reviewed by Apple. So, there would exist counter-evidence for the govt claim.
Don’t misunderstand, I see how this system is ripe for abuse. I was just commenting on the specific claim that there will be automated SWAT call outs (presumably in the US).
The problem is that they can do whatever if you have CP. Emphasis on "have": you might not even know you have it, because all it takes for you to be guilty is for a forbidden bit of data to be on your disk or cloud account. How did it end there? Doesn't matter much. It's unlikely you'll be convicted if someone else maliciously puts CP on your drive, but it's extremely likely your whole neighborhood will know about it before it's settled. Think about that.
> They don’t need Apples system.
Apple's system makes it sure that whenever someone puts CP on someone else's account, it rings the police and starts the nightmare. Without it, there's a few extra steps that make the nightmare much less likely to happen in the first place.
The only argument I made was against the claim that fully automated police dispatches will occur because of this system (in the west).
Making outrageous, tinfoil hat level claims does not help our collective argument against this system.
It just makes us look like paranoid conspiracy theorists.
Let’s make coherent arguments (like the one you made above) instead of fantasy ones.
That said, I don’t like my phone being a snitch.