(1) I'm a bit frustrated, as a true Apple "bitch", at the irony here. As a loyal consumer, I am (likely) never going to be privileged enough to know exactly which part of Apple's budget allowed for this implementation to occur. I can only assume that such data would speak volumes as to _why_ the decision to introduce CSAM this way has come to light.

(2) I'm equally intrigued by the paradox that in order for the algorithms that perform the CSAM detection to work, it must require some data set that represents these reprehensible images (which are illegal to possess).