As a potential law student how would you frame your argument against lockdowns in a world where trust in subject matter experts is down across the board (on both side, pro and against lockdowns)?
The gist has been the same, the constitution doesn’t appear to be being followed and as a lawyer you have the ability to defend your rights.
I’m not sure what caused this particular spike (a lot of alone time?) but I know a lot of people are feeling this way.
In terms of an argument: 1st, 4th, 5th, 9th, 14th are amendments are clearly being violated in many regions. Further, given the risk profile of this disease (mitigation’s, high survival rate, etc), there’s no reasonable argument to abridge rights. Particularly, for a long period of time
So, clearly there’s some issue there.
In LA they were shutting off peoples utilities for not following mayoral edicts.
The first amendment for peaceable assembly doesn’t go away — period — during time of crisis. Facebook has a portal setup where the CA Secretary of State is marking content to ban (court case is making its way through the federal circuits)
Arguably, the 9th amendment is being violated as it related to vaccine passports. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt9-2-1/ALD...
There is an absolute insane number of issues with the past year... I can go on and on
“The Constitution is not a suicide pact”
I think a gofundme funded by likeminded people to support your doomed lawsuits would be a lot more cost efficient than going to law school.