Hacker News Reader

HNHacker News

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

Comment by rantwasp | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

rantwasp·

posted some references in here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28028126

also, start with this and do a bit of research:

https://michaelkummer.com/health/plants-vs-meat/

View on HN

Scientific studies would be better sources of information than articles. In any case, the evolutionary discussions are not an argument for modern diets, for obvious reasons. The only thing with any merit in the links you posted is about DHA. Your body CAN produce it from plant sources, but if you must insist on taking DHA, it comes from algae, and there are algal sources. Animal sources get it from algae as well. If you are suggesting nutricional deficiencies due to DHA you need to provide real references indicating that, and not general articles on the nutritional profiles of meat vs vegetables that make vague associations with health outcomes.

you missed the 2nd part: access to a nutritionist or have a lot of knowledge about nutrition yourself.

there is no way average joe can figure all these things out on a limited budget + limited time

evolutionary considerations are a part if everything. you cannot ignore how you got here and biology

If you want to look at health outcomes, the average diet of the nutritionally ignorant is almost always going to be worse than a vegan diet, ignorantly planned or not. The majority of the US populace (mostly meat eating) is very unhealthy and sick due to nutritional ignorance, so this is a very weak argument. Furthermore, meat is a known carcinogen and inflammatory. Its absurd to me that health reasons are attempted to be used as an argument against plant based diets.

To be frank, using the argument that plant based diets are "privileged" is cynical and disingenuous.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com