Or regressive, depending on the nature and effect of the change.
Are you being serious with this linguistic game? One might just as well argue that stopping the construction gravy train would be the progressive push for change, while letting it continue even to absurd conclusions like empty skyscrapers and bridges to nowhere is the conservative position.
I seem to remember a conservative Alaska senator championing a bridge to nowhere.
So by this definition, if I want to get rid of Social Security and Medicare and let the elderly and sick fend for themselves - I'm a progressive.
You can't make an omelet without bankrupting a few old birds.