In fact IIRC the overall death rate (i.e. just counting how many people died of all causes following vaccine administration) has, in fact (this is hardly surprising given the general pandemic environment) been shown to be significantly lower for the vaccinated.
I don't know what you're citing, but it doesn't track with existing science, sorry.
> I would be fired for even sharing my opinions.
My guess is it would be your factual assertions and not your "opinions" that would get you in trouble.
"Up to and including July 16, 2021, a total of 152 deaths were reported after the administration of a vaccine."
https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-safety/#a...
People will die no matter whether they're vaccinated or not, the question is a) will they die because of covid and b) will they die because of the vaccine. Your statistics do not even approach this question.
- 33 are under investigation
- 61 unrelated to the vaccine
- 52 had insufficient information to determine if the vaccine was linked to the death
and finally the piece of information we're interested in:
- 6 due to TTS (a known side-effect), all from people who received the COVISHIELD/AstraZeneca vaccine
Is not the same as 61 unrelated to the vaccine.
You do understand it also does not mean they are related to the vaccine, right?
I mean, putting aside the grasping as straws aspect of this claim, let's look at your original claim: in a country where there are already 20 million person's who already were administered the vaccine, and given that by your own account you can only put together two dozen cases among those 20 million that are not ruled out vaccine side-effects, don't you agree that the tradeoff is clear?
To put it accurately, there is absolutely no indication that any vaccine has any long-term effect whatsoever.
Doesn't this mean you are trying to analyze tradeoffs of a problem that does not exist in the plane of reality?
"However, the leaky vaccine changes this evolutionary pressure and permits the evolution of highly virulent strains.[13] The vaccine's inability to prevent infection and transmission allows the spread of highly virulent strains among vaccinated chickens."
44,694,799 total doses administered, if all of these were two shots than that would be over 22,000,000 people.
What is the death rate of 22,000,000 infected people without vaccination?
1) You are assuming that the current set of vaccines will stop the spread of this disease. This is already in doubt due to break away strains. In fact, it's possible that the currently vaccinated will be more susceptible to spread the new strains. This week's mask mandate was all about the vaccinated spreading the delta strain and having more viral load in their nose . Naturally gained immunity is know to offer more protection from being reinfected with the virus. People that carry antibodies because they had the disease are more resilient because their immune system recognizes the virus by more than just the spike protein.
2. You are assuming 22,000,000 would otherwise get infected with Covid. This is not necessarily true. Young people don't get sick. Herd immunity, therapeutics and better future treatments make this unlikely.
3. We don't know the long term effects of the vaccine yet, thus can't make an ultimate call on the actual comparative rates of deaths. Hypothetically, what if the vaccine reduces life expectancy by 10 years, of millions of people. Would it still be better than natural herd immunity.
2) You are confusing infection with infection disease. You can be sure you will get infected by the corona virus but that doesn't mean you'll get COVID. If 22,000,000 people get the corona virus if with low IFR like 0.003 you get 660 deaths and that's only for people under 30. Additionally you are ignoring the effect of the variants you are referencing in 1) Young people are more likely to get sick by the variants and herd immunity is based on antibodies and therefore have the same problem as he vaccine based antibodies. A new variant could make them equally useless.
3) We don't know the long term effects by corona either. In contrast to the vaccines, we have already found evidence of organ damage in the heart , lungs and kidneys with Corona, which may not disappear even in the long term.
The bottom line is that the risk without vaccination is much higher than with vaccination.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/ad...
This is also not a vaccine trial, there are far more people who have been vaccinated than would be in any trial, by orders of magnitude.
I in no way think those numbers are complete, but given the number of doses given and the astonishing rarity of those very specific issues, I have to question your comment.
I’m in an extraordinarily healthy population (military) and I know of no one that has had any reactions at all, as a counterpoint. Given the political leanings of my peer group, I’m positive I would have heard about it.
Do you have a VAERS ID number? Do you have a link to a news report you can share? Not to be dark, but do you have a link to an obituary?
Because it's a little hard to take your claims as anything more than unsourced anecdotes that can be summed up by the CDCs adverse events statistics.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/ad...
I could go looking for trouble in the VAERS database but I think aggregate statistics are better for getting a feel for how safe the vaccine is.