Hacker News Reader

Comment by forcry | Hacker News Reader

What I don't get is this this "growing body of evidence" does not seem to apply when it comes to things like Ivermectin, where they don't consider anything other than some high quality RCT, and reject all observational data.

But when it comes to vaccines, they are so OK to make suggestions (to put it mildly) based on observational data..

View on HN

I don't think I've encountered vaccine suggestions based on observational data. Can you give an example?

I mean, I think there are no RCTs done for supporting the following claims.

1. That vaccines will reduce transmission, even when it does not prevent infection.

2. That vaccines will reduce hospitalisations even when it does not prevent infection.

Here is a scientific study on the vaccine using observational data:

https://www.globalresearch.ca/study-electromagnetism-vaccina...

No offence but "Vaccines will make you magnetic!" is not a scientific study, it is Loony tunes. Looking at the front page of that site, yes, it seems a total batshit-factory, right down to the mention of 'Great Reset' and "Governments Are Lying to You the People".

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Globalresearch

It is a loony tunes experiment that ANYONE can reproduce. Even on themselves. What do you think people will wonder when they test it out and find out that magnets stick to them?

AND -

The thought I had today on the way to work was a what if: If the vaccinated are really becoming electromagnetic, how would they be affected by an EMP burst?

The "magnet/metal sticking to skin" trick has been around for a long time. See for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTVWMY8EZCA

Comes down to the angle and stickiness of skin.

> If the vaccinated are really becoming electromagnetic

But they aren't; that's as nutty as a fruitcake. You are exhibiting exactly zero critical thinking ability.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com