I’d encourage you to think about why you responded to this article about human misery by searching for reasons the humans deserve to be miserable.
W/R/T the top-level comment: to frame coercive forces (isolation, geography, exploitation, and so on) as matters purely of individual choices speaks to a deep rejection of systems thinking that’s both
a. unproductive in a conversation about labor practices resulting from intricate and brutal edifices of human suffering, and
b. misses the point of collective action, which has over the course of multiple centuries chipped away at the brutality of said edifices, strike by strike.