Good. No young people should be "required" to take the vaccine. Freedom of choice and respect of the body first.
If you are for freedom of choice on one end, you should also be for freedom of choice on the other end.
Secondly at the end businesses and governments follow the majority opinion.. And for that, I support Clapton to put pressure on clubs and voice his opinion
Funny how nobody complains children can’t attend school without a vaccine.
You can always smell a stupid political tribal political opinion when people act like they want to die on a hill in the name of freedom, yet run the nearest ER like little babies when they get sick.
Put your money where your mouth is. Put your name on a public list declaring you irrevocably refuse treatment if you get the virus.
Opposing our reaction to the pandemic is one thing, believing that Schrodinger’s virus simultaneously doesn’t exist and is treatable by something else is hilarious stupidity.
So first if you had read the article it's the uk governement not a businesses rule. Secondly businesses and governement follow the majority opinions. It's a good thing people like Clapton voice their optinion
> You can always smell a stupid political tribal political opinion when people act like they want to die on a hill in the name of freedom, yet run the nearest ER like little babies when they get sick.
> Put your money where your mouth is. Put your name on a public list declaring you irrevocably refuse treatment if you get the virus.
Chill down keyboard warrior. The fact it's not treatable by anything else than vaccine doesn't mean it's good or even legal to coerce people into taking the vaccine, or plainly discriminate against those who don't for whatever reason (starting with pregnant women). As a matter of facts it's actually very clearly illegal in europe to do so, since the vaccines are still "experimental drugs". here's a french article with legal sources if you want the details.
https://www.google.com/search?channel=fs&client=ubuntu&q=med...