Nothing in that article describes Trump or the Republican Party speaking against the "concept of government itself." That would make them anarchists, which clearly they are not. The article points out numerous pro-government positions by Trump and implies that his position on the legitimate purpose and scope of government, rather than being founded on a rigid anti-government ideological core, is entirely transactional. The same guy who supported political protests against vaccination procedures and his opponent's election was shouting "LAW AND ORDER" from Twitter and sending troops into Portland... to crack down on political protesters.

And as far as the Republicans themselves go, the party is famously pro-military, pro-police, pro hardline stances on drug enforcement and immigration, and pro Constitution. The only form of government they consistently oppose are social programs (with the exceptions of agricultural subsidies and the GI bill), spending related to arts and sciences, public education and anything else they consider "leftist" (or more simply, anything their political opponents support.)

Both sides criticize and question the legitimacy of government when in opposition. The point stands.

Separate from the partisan nonsense, it is possible that government overreaches. There are legitimate criticisms of government largess. However, blanketly categorizing these criticisms as anti-government is also nonsense. Especially if it is in pursuit of a nakedly partisan point.

If you were truly informed and educated as you claim you would know that our founding fathers had the foresight to anticipate the badness of government as a necessary evil (their words). We enjoy the high quality of life due to our constitution which enable the freedoms and sacrifice of Americans before us, despite the government's interference along the way.