That approach just helps con artists rip off desperate ignorant people, promoting a worldview that magic is a viable alternative to scientific reality, a view held by a dangerously large and easily exploited percentage of the population.
If you have evidence otherwise, I'd be interested to see it.
Show them something that goes against those beliefs, and suddenly you'll be fielding skepticisms of sample sizes, P-values, the ideological leanings of the principal investigators, etc.
People do not live their lives governed by scientific knowledge, and ignoring that isn't going to change the status quo.