Entire comment section: b-b-but the US.
Entire comment section: b-b-but the US.
China probably is "hacking us." US/NATO credibility is suspect.
I'm tired of this argument because it just serves the propagandists. It eliminates a real conversation happening because we can't even start one because we don't even agree on a basic premise of that things can be judged independently. Comparisons can be great, but independent judgement/criticism is also necessary.
I agree that a lot of the comments here are shitposting or making reactionary equivocations. Others though, are making valid points... which you may agree with, or not.
IMO, for example, the most important part of this to pay attention to is NATO. Cybersecurity & China seem to be the new focus of the alliance. To me, this seems like the most potentially impactful aspect.. and probably a key reason why this announcement was made in the way that it was made. IE, I think that what NATO do in the coming few years will make the history books, rather than Chinese cyberattacks. I may be wrong, but this isn't a disingenuous equivocation. It's just my judgement on this, at this point.
This isn't just a thread about chinese hacking, it's a thread about a US-NATO statement in response to hacking.
Anyway, who cares about convicting one or the other. This is about consequences. The consequences of whatever direction NATO is taking now are meaningful.. much more meaningful than the hack.