I'm also not sure that the author is correct; the wrong-focal-distance explanation seems rather weak simply because our focal length is adjustable.
I'm also not sure that the author is correct; the wrong-focal-distance explanation seems rather weak simply because our focal length is adjustable.
Blue LEDs in clocks when viewed at night look completely fucked up.
Signed, a dude with very slight astigmatism :)
crdrost described their vision problems, jbluepolarbear said "you have astigmatism", techrat popped in and said "[I have] no astigmatism" and jbluepolarbear made a more general statement that most people do.
I'd assume techrat doesn't know anything about crdrost's vision either.
Bruh. Read the comment of mine you replied to. 20/10 and 20/13 vision. I don't need prescriptions.
This whole thread is silly.
If we're doing dumb analogies, it's like you're trying to insist a homeless man must have an address.
Off topic, but I'm jumping around a bit tonight.
I could totally believe the someone might have "perfect" vision that doesn't require correction, but still have a slight astigmatism that impacts their vision under certain specific scenarios such as when viewing blue LEDs in low light.
I'm not necessarily saying that's what you have, but more just that to the extent your eyes have been evaluated, it was likely "yeah they look great as far as your ability to perceive the brightly lit eye chart, no need to do the more detailed analysis where we figure out the other parameters that will never be used because you're fine, bye."
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/8576-astigmat...