> The text preemptively claims that people will reject it because they are too politically correct.
The text was right.
> From the beginning it was a slanted criticism of Google’s hiring practices.
Yes, how does this relate to the original point?
Weird how a lot of academics don't agree.
Even in the legal system "expert testimony" can be a dubious process - in the court of press-media there is no bar to cherry-picking.
Yeah, so? You say that as if the fact that a lot of people did exactly that for exactly that reason somehow shows some flaw with the text.