We keep hearing so many stories, I honestly believe that Gillibrand could be working on a new bill with an appended 'S'; hoping it somehow changes something.
Our political system here in the U.S.A. is kinda fubar isn't it...
https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2013/04/16/17749...
Putting in laws are only as useful as them getting actually enforced.
Any time you get stories like these implying that one side and only one side has corruption on it, you need to look real close because it's almost certainly a load of biased baloney.
Oh God.
I'm learning a lot about this I didn't know tonight, thanks.
Ironically, as someone who would like government to employ smarter and more successful people, I'm left wondering how much of their finances we can and should expose. But given how corrupt things seem it feels like we still need to push on this.
Now before I start trying to imagine a way two high power congress members could game the public information requirements between each other, I should go to sleep.
I'll be curious if they ever work out a definition for "benefit" here.
[0]: https://www.gillibrand.senate.gov/news/press/release/icymi-g...