So, you're telling me, that if they don't do controlled burns, you could end up with a huge inferno?! Impossible.
Next you'll be saying that the huge infernos are orchestrated, in order to promote the idea that climate change is out of control!
Putting aside the climate change being out of control, can we try to consider this from a 'perception management' perspective.
If there are lots of huge fires that would create the impression in the news of huge climate change issues, would it not? But, would that be a fair assessment, if the huge fires have been orchestrated by a failure to do what we have known about for centuries?
I don't think so.
But using this issue to create the impression of climate is what is happening - eg the fires last year is Australia. These were framed as another massive climate change issue, not as a governmental failure (to undertake controlled burns). The effect is that we wring our hands over another massive climate change issue going unaddressed, whereas what is going on is a contrived situation that is framed on climate change.
TLDR: These fires are *not* climate change - its only *portrayed* as climate change.