>You don't have the right to simply ignore all the research going into this and be treated seriously.
Replace "research" with "stuff a bunch of people you believe say", and the situation will become much more clear.
Replace "research" with "stuff a bunch of people you believe say", and the situation will become much more clear.
On the contrary being this naive...
E.g. here is a point you made that doesn't even remotely apply here:
> If you do an experiment that very few people in the world is able to replicate, because it is hard or due to lack of resources, then the rest of the world have to trust you.
These vaccines have been taken by _millions_ of people. They have been given by many different independent organizations. So yeah this doesn't even apply at all.
> The trust of people should be won, research by research, not authority by authority, and the non-requirement of mandates goes along automatically with that idea.
Essentially all the research points towards the vaccines being much much better than the disease. It's your choice to stick your head in the sand if you so wish, but no one need respect your decision. You're not somehow wise simply due to your being contrarian.