Hacker News Reader

Comment by optimiz3 | Hacker News Reader

> puts everybody and their children at risk

Oh won't somebody think of the children?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_of_the_children

Out of all the times to mock someone saying that, I don't think "self-driving-but-not-really-car nearly crashes into things and puts the occupants and bystanders at risk for serious bodily harm as evident by the videos posted above" is one of those times.

Wait till you read the stats and see videos of what humans driving cars regularly do!

Still, an autopilot should aim to be a peer with the best drivers, not with mediocre or bad drivers.

Well if you think of this closed beta as a way for Tesla to collect data about its program's shortcomings it's easy enough to see how releasing could save lives in the long run even it is takes some in the short run. Every day sooner that a 10x better self driving car comes is hundreds of lives saved.

And what if it gets stuck in a local maximum and never improves? Then you lost those extra lives for no reason, which consequently is what I believe has happened. At least 4 people are dead in preventable autopilot crashes, and the real number is probably over 10. For the number of Tesla’s on the road that number is way too high.

https://tesladeaths.com

4 deaths is worth a 1% increased chance of achieving self driving a month earlier. Way more than 400 people a month die in car accidents.

I somehow get the feeling that you don't actually want to save lives but rather want to experience the future™, whatever it costs.

I just don’t understand why people think a robot can improve on this.

If you want to save lives, lower speed limits, build out public transit, and don’t hand out drivers licenses like candy.

I don't only want to save lives, I want to maximize utility. I think driving less would raise utility, but society disagrees, so this is the next best option.

Right, fair point, people drive 80mph because they have someplace to be. I’m perennially bummed that America can’t figure out how to build high speed rail for less than $100 Million per mile.

A peer with average drivers would probably be fine.

A peer with average drivers and doing completely nonsensical things every now and then is basically an average driver on their cell phone though and the verdict on that is that it's not fine.

It's a limited beta with the goal of discovering error cases.

In this case I'd prefer if "discovering error cases" was done without risking actual lives. Injuring someone would not be a valid way discover an error case.

Beta limited to regular drivers that are not specifically trained testers. Error cases can involve injury or death.

Humans do way, way, way better than what we've seen in the FSD beta testers' videos (most of whom are huge Tesla fans)

It's still appropriate. The issue is using children to appeal to the emotions of parents, as if children were VIP humans. Yes, they are very important people, but mostly to their parents and close relatives.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com