I did not comment at all about the "rightness or wrongness" of what either side did: My comment was more about the American media and how it covered the conflict. My honest feelings about the region are that it's a bunch of people who have been brutal to each other for centuries (and continue to be), but if you watched Christian Amanpour on CNN during that time, you would get the impression that it was an entirely one-sided conflict where only the Serbs did wrong and we were completely justified in stepping in and waging war. In my opinion, I think in 100 years looking back this will be remembered by some very observant historians as the prelude to Afghanistan/Iraq and the "beginning of the end" of America's dominance. People were complete tools, there was not even the hint of a counter-narrative to the "Serbs are bad" stories being pushed by the govt through mainstream media. The real story, of course, was a lot more complicated. The Serbs weren't "right" for trying to get revenge on people who collaborated with Hitler to exterminate them but that background information was never even presented while the war was being sold to US public.

Muslim Bosnians and Albanians are not Croats and have nothing to do with whatever you are describing. Serbs find any way to justify their horrendous act, except come out clean and move on to have better relations with their neighbors.

>had nothing to do with it and what happened during WW2

Outsiders meddling and their uninformed[1] rhetoric complicate things further.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13th_Waffen_Mountain_Division_...