EDIT: I remembered wrong, parents are charged for the test and then the state monetizes their baby’s DNA anyway.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-biobank-dna-babies-w...
There's probably something about this somewhere in the fine print on something they signed without reading, but most donors aren't aware of it.
There has been some controversy over that because there have been lucrative commercial drugs derived from research using such blood, and some feel that the donors should be given a cut of the profits.
Unless they managed to sneak the hooker clause into the fine print and I missed it. In which case, well done, carry on.
In this case the data was actually collected and analyzed with consent (as stated in the article).