A bit of a nit pick here, but this issue does not fall cleanly across partisan lines. Some of the most vocal advocates for zoning reform are on the left. And at least in my town, a fair number of folks in the anti-development camp are traditionally right leaning well off suburbanites. If I could pick one issue that most scrambles the traditional partisan alignments, this would probably be it.
I characterize it as "alt"-right because the right has largely been taken over by Trumpian issues. And the right is generally anti-density and all that it comes with like, rural and suburban areas, cars, and keeping the undesirables away. Trump even had that bill that was about preventing zoning fixes that would "invade the suburbs."[0]
[0]https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/23/trumplow-income-hou...
it is sad that NIMBYs dont get it
Kind of a weird statement. Having grown up in a small town, there's wasn't a "hyper liberal" person in sight.
The elitist, anti-growth, outsiders-are-destroying-this-place attitude is pervasive everywhere. It's absolutely not a party thing. It just so happens that California has a lot of outsiders wanting to move there, and is left-leaning. That's it. You see the same exact attitudes in towns in Wyoming, Texas, and Florida too.
It's a very longstanding cliche to complain about people from California moving into the nearby states. Lots of that when I went to school in AZ in the 90s.
> By submitting my information, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. In fact, the authors point out, even those who were previously Republicans “shift markedly” toward the Democratic party once they receive an FHA loan. It could be that those who receive FHA-backed loans recognize the value of government in helping them obtain a low-interest mortgage or perhaps it is because FHA loans are only available for more modest loans, and are more likely to be taken by working- or middle-class people. At the same time, Republicans who do not use FHA loans become even more Republican.
> It’s not just that becoming homeowners makes people more NIMBYish, or that homeownership locks people into place, but buying a home changes people’s political behavior writ large. Once someone buys a home, they act politically to protect its value. As the authors point out: “Overall, the results suggest that individual economic circumstances importantly influence political beliefs and behavior, and suggest that homeowners have special influence in American politics in part because their ownership motivates them to pay attention and to participate.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-08-28/how-homeo...
Oh look, another HN commenter with 0 idea of what he is talking about, but all the bravado to support his dumb position.
Are homeowners more likely to have what political leaning?
It’s not really that bizarre when you accept that it’s part of the human condition. Then you start seeing the pattern all over the place, especially in politics.
I have two degrees where the concept is pretty much taught in the first hour of 101 classes: economics (cost of opportunity) and software engineering (design trade-offs). And while I see through the pattern quite well, I wish I could say my behavior is always perfectly consistent with what I know.