Hacker News Reader

...for now. I'm not usually one to pull the slippery slope argument but they seem to be overstepping quite a bit here.

When UK banks let people hand their life savings to fraudsters without a quibble they get made to compensate those people. We can't have it both ways.

I see you guys have never had your bank call you and ask what you are doing with all that cash you are withdrawling, for their report for the government. I should've just said 'strippers'.

That’s the government’s rule though, not your bank’s. And if that’s too much information to provide, you can still not use a bank and instead stuff cash under your mattress.

That's what people always said: if you don't like Twitter's policies, build your own.

Turns out if you do that, you'll also need to build your own AWS, your own DNS, your own payment systems, your own internet providers.

No, it doesn't work this way.

That doesn’t stop them asking though.