I prefer to build natural immunity than inject with experimental genetic drug. I think is optimal.
By “genetic drug” I’m assuming you mean either the mRNA vaccines developed by Pfizer/Moderna or the viral vector vaccines developed by AstraZeneca/Johnson & Johnson.
The claim that either technology is “experimental” is false. Both have undergone the same rigorous trials and testing as other vaccines before being rolled out to the public: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid-vaccines-idU...
Your “natural immunity” also doesn’t protect other people around you from contracting the disease and suffering from a very severe illness, whereas there is growing evidence that the vaccines available also cut transmission risk: https://khub.net/documents/135939561/390853656/Impact+of+vac...
Would you feel the same way if you were to come across a child drowning in a shallow pond and had an opportunity to save them with the only “cost” to you being the inconvenience of being cold and wet?
Welcome to a low trust society.
Where collective action is nigh impossible by virtue of the near constant degree to which people can be found to have ulterior motives.
Big logic time. Between the people who question everything and the others who believe science is a religion I would hope most people find a middle ground
>The media.
Who has been caught having issues with cherry-picking narratives and having issues with the truth lately?
>The media.
Who is generating those numbers?
>Scientists and for profit businesses.
Who has had a track record of poor reproducibility in research, publish or perish paper mills and citation rings, and pushing treatments that harm patients in the long run to fill the coffers (opioids)?
>Scientists and for-profit businesses.
Ya know, in a way, all the arguments I've had with people over radiocarbon dating has finally taught me something precious about science, and the cutting edge.
It's too important to leave locked behind private entities. All the hyperadvamced analysis and techniques doesn't do squat to keep you credible with the masses. You have to make it something people can actually get close enough to see and absorb/experience for themselves.
Without trust, not for all the good faith in Christendom will anyone get anything out of or over me. -apologies to J.P. Morgan
I can't really argue over the conclusions common sense leads to. I don't personally buy it, but I can unfortunately understand it. A lot of uncommon sense, unfortunately, tends to find it's way to making people who rely on common sense miserable.
This is why we can't have nice things.