I can't see the harm in teaching teenagers the geographic impact of climate change:

> 'The Scottish Qualifications Authority geography course gave benefits of climate change such as “increased tourism to more northerly latitudes” and “improved crop yields,” [saying]: “Analysing and evaluating a variety of views is essential to critical thinking.”'

Is it so outlandish to talk about these long term realities? Can students not be instructed that this is not a justification, but rather an anticipated adjustment?