https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/28/fitness-tracki...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/28/fitness-tracki...
The "fitness tracking app Starva" did not reveal the secret army base, soldiers inappropriately using their phones and broadcasting their routines by using a civilian application designed to share their location revealed the secret army base.
I know it sounds pedantic, but I think we should be very careful about verbiage when it comes to who is to blame here: it's not the apps. This kind of thing gets exacerbated hugely by media headlines too - always putting the app front-and-center and downplaying the policy/training/OpSec failures. This leads to erroneous and scary conclusions like "apps should be flagged for national security" like the GP mentioned - but the actual takeaway should be that we need to train the dang soldiers operational security.
Wording matter.
It does.
"a person getting hit by a car" is quite neutral.
"a driver ramming their car into a person"."
This sounds intentional and shifts blame to the driver.
A good image breaking down a news article in this way: https://www.camcycle.org.uk/magazine/newsletter110/article8/
It says "the victim was struck" as if it was their fault being where they were, not "the driver struck the victim".