I prefer something with a degree of spatial orientation, i.e persistent physical location/hierarchy. With the right organization it seems like tiddlywiki can do that.
I prefer something with a degree of spatial orientation, i.e persistent physical location/hierarchy. With the right organization it seems like tiddlywiki can do that.
Full disclosure though: the way collaboration works is optimized to allow for very granular sharing of cards, which is great when you want to share here and there with a wide variety of people (some cards you want to share with friends, some with family, some with your co-workers, some with your clients, etc). But if your goal is to collaborate with co-workers on a shared knowledge base, there are other tools that are probably better suited which we point people towards if that is their use case, like Notion/Craft/etc. Our focus is individual use first and then trying to seamlessly blend collab into that experience.
With that said, we do have a few teams using the platform so YMMV.
The UX is imperfect but the structure is proving useful to me. It’s habit now that if anything needs to be recorded from a meeting, it’s in Agenda, and tied to the meeting, so I lose less context.
A challenge related to remote work, for me, is that if I’m not careful a day’s meetings can blend into each other. I’ve definitely had meetings “escape” me - I was on the call but a week later I can’t recall much and my notes on a paper aren’t as useful as they should be.