> I had to read this a few times to understand that this isn’t saying that Pocketlang is not written in Wren
I had to read that a few times to understand what I think is an unintentional double negative on your part.
I had to read that a few times to understand what I think is an unintentional double negative on your part.
The author used Wren as an example/reference on how to build a programming language, but built something unrelated to it.
Correct?
I shouldn’t be allowed on HN until I’ve had my morning coffee.