Interesting use case.

Some quick feedback on the homepage: - "predictable": serverless is not exactly "predictable". On the other end, having a set number of instances is :) - "low cost": this assumes specific patterns of usage under a threshold where it's profitable to use serverless. That's entirely "use-case dependant" & a bit misleading. - "constant speed": so you're saying that the worst case scenario is bounded to 150ms, no matter the data set?

Pointing these out because it makes it read as "yet another DB vendor with some unrealistic claims" :)