From the exact same article:
> According to Simon MacKenzie, "callous self-interest and a desire for retribution played a role in the fate" of German prisoners, and he exemplifies by pointing out that sick or otherwise unfit prisoners were forcibly used for labor, and in France and the [Netherlands] this also included work such as highly dangerous mine-clearing; "by September 1945 it was estimated by the French authorities that two thousand prisoners were being maimed and killed each month in accidents." [...] In retaliation for acts of resistance, French occupation forces expelled more than 25,000 civilians from their homes. Some of these civilians were subsequently forced to clear minefields in Alsace.
Yes, the Soviet Union was extremely brutal on a scale and with an intensity higher than most other contemporary countries.
But if that's your only takeaway from the linked article, you're not trying to learn, you're trying to reinforce your pre-existing beliefs.
I literally grew up with stories from my grandparents of being displaced after WW2 from what is now poland. I am well aware of just how but just about everyone was during and after the war. You are aware that i was the one that linked the article? Besides, the crimes against the german population after WW2 were retaliatory in nature in the non-soviet countries while quite obviously just another crime against humanity by the soviet system that was just as brutal to "their own" as to the german population.
I stand by my point.
My initial post was a remark on the brutality of the US Allies in the immediate post-war period. It seems like bad faith to single out the USSR as if they were an exception.
I don't get why climate change is a "leftist" issue for those people, and yet..
And to be fully fair, von Bismarck only did it to preempt social democrats' talking points and popularity.
https://jacobinmag.com/2019/12/otto-von-bismarck-germany-soc...
and from a US-centerish perspective here
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/bismarck-tried-end-so...