Doesn't matter if people want to go there. The point is that it exists, and the model is governed by the taxpayers.
Doesn't matter if people want to go there. The point is that it exists, and the model is governed by the taxpayers.
Impact of a government social media: If you get banned from Facebook, you have the option to post your non-illegal content on townsquare.us. Therefore, your free speech rights are not being impacted. The right to speak is not the right to be heard by the audience of your choice.
I get that you don't share concerns about deplatforming, but presenting this as a solution to those concerns is not accurate.
But none of those platforms draw a direct line between the constitutional guarantee of free speech and implementation of that speech. That’s the idea behind the public option: it’s the constitution with teeth, freedom in its purest form, while leaving corporations open to experiment with restrictions as the market demands.