If Chinese state actors are culpable for the pandemic, it seems plausible other nations will seek damages from the Chinese government. If not paid, they may levy fines on commerce from Chinese companies.
However, I'm still very skeptical of "lab leak", I think the zoonotic origin is most likely. If the zoonotic origin resulted from poorly regulated wet markets, however, Covid is just as much a result of bad government policy by China as in the lab leak case.
China needs to convince the world that they have taken steps which will prevent Covid from ever happening again. At a minimum, this includes tightly regulating wet markets so that animals will be "socially distanced" with good ventilation, if not banning wet markets altogether. If China is unwilling to do this, they present an ongoing pandemic risk, and it seems reasonable for the rest of the world to restrict travel to China until they comply.
The US had sponsored virus research in Wuhan's lab possibly including "gain of function". If COVID leaked from that lab it could make the US culpable as well.
Even the developing countries who benefit from Chinese investment could benefit from this, because if the financial pain is high enough, they may have more leverage to renegotiate the terms of repayment.
I would not call that irrelevant in the slightest.
Further reading here: https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/03/18/1021030/coronavi...
It calls into question the entire premise of this sort of research. If the risk of accidental release in the course of this research is greater than the risk of a natural pandemic, then the research should be discontinued. Of course anybody who is involved in this sort of research has a strong personal incentive to discourage such lines of thought, since it could end their careers.
Well yeah, and those safety protocols could've prevented the pandemic. You're arguing this isn't important? This could prevent the next black plague, regardless of whether it was released intentionally or not (I do not believe it was released intentionally, my point is that's irrelevant to this discussion of public safety).
Unfortunately, while (2) is still true, the majority of the news coverage is around (1).
If it truly passed from a bat/pangolin/chicken, etc we can begin to deal with the sources of that vector.
This truly is a serious question that must be resolved.
of course it's actually meaningless. the actual crime was the cover up that occurred after the virus was on the loose, delaying preparations and making containment impossible. we already know that happened
As a hypothetical let's assume this disease was created, enhanced, released and let's even say all of this was done deliberately with malice of forethought.
Doesn't alter a thing - our collective response was 'C-'
Media attention == media sales
Well... that is how I see it.