In any case, English is the most popular second-language in 55 countries, so it's not a bad guess to write this article in terms of English.
In any case, English is the most popular second-language in 55 countries, so it's not a bad guess to write this article in terms of English.
The author could have couched the entire article from the point of view that a native speaker is difficult for non-native speakers to understand. I was simply pointing out that the article points an accusing finger at a particular group, when the issue at hand isn't a particular language, but the situation in question.
This is definitely something that communicators and collaborators need to be aware of, but the article, at least to me, demonizes a particular group even though the issue isn't inherent to that group.
It is just a matter of native nuances being difficult to understand for non-natives of any language...
And also the fact that English is the language most used for international meetings anywhere in the world.