That was among people who drank at all; for reference, that's just under two standard drinks per day, which is apparently what the UK considers the threshold of "low risk".
That was among people who drank at all; for reference, that's just under two standard drinks per day, which is apparently what the UK considers the threshold of "low risk".
https://www.alcohol.org/guides/volume-of-non-drinkers-by-us-...
Can someone explain these numbers to me? They claim to measure one “standard drink” (all of which are equal), yet each variant is a different number of units? Furthermore, wine is more (stronger?) than spirits? I must be missing something.
5oz of wine * 12% = 1.5oz of spirits * 40% = 12oz of beer * 5%
so I'm still confused...
Edit: Wait, do you mean the size of a full glass? That's... an odd way to measure things.
You go to the same pub and order a shot of whiskey, and it's about 1.5oz, so it's the same as you think it is.
https://slate.com/technology/2014/10/how-much-alcohol-do-ame...
One of the rare articles that discusses median consumption rather than mean average.
"The more I thought about these data, the stranger they seemed. My 11-drink-per-week habit corresponds almost exactly to the national average, 556 drinks per year. But according to this chart, that number would be grossly misleading, since it combines the huge number of people who never quaff at all with the much smaller group who drink like it’s their job. (Those in the top decile of consumption swig an incomprehensible average of 74 drinks per week.) When I compare my habit to the median instead of the mean, I find that I’m dosing myself with 10 times more alcohol than the typical American."