However i see this as being a bit like the BBC problem: beleiving there is such a thing as being objective, there just isnt.
You can have a group of likeminded people who mostly agree and need a bit of moderation for when someones external bad day leaks into their interactions on the plaform. However if there is an underlying fundamental difference of opinion or goals then the moderators become just another weapon.
We need leaders not moderators. Moderators in difference of opinion just end up punishing the weak one way or another. Leaders show by example what we can aspire to, which in turn guides moderators in how to apply the rules.
If you have global platforms who are the leaders? What direction should they lead that works for china and the US?