> In fact, most efforts have made it worse across the board
Have they? Most social democracies seem to be going along fine.
There is a sliding scale between Hayek and Marx you know.. it’s not a binary choice
Have they? Most social democracies seem to be going along fine.
There is a sliding scale between Hayek and Marx you know.. it’s not a binary choice
And the harder its pushed for "equality", the more it turns into bad times.
"binary" I never said it was... I said increasing efforts generally trend towards increasingly bad consequences - and we are talking about pushes to end "inequality" in this chain of conversation... the harder the pushes, the worse the outcomes.
At no point in any society has inequality been removed.
I think global inequality has drastically reduced these past 30 years. Don’t forget that 30 years ago for anyone in India or China the main prospect was subsistence farming.
And why are the consequences of curbing inequality increasingly bad? What is “increasingly bad” about the Nordic countries?