I'm not so sure. Spending the time (and money) researching it and developing a patent tends to indicate a desire for them to integrate the technology.
I'd argue against "is going to", but "wants to" seems fairly correct.
I'd argue against "is going to", but "wants to" seems fairly correct.
While ideally you'd want to focus on patents for things you're actively pursuing, if there's budget for more patents and the latest set of applications are weak, then the team could end up pursuing applications that the development team has no intention of pursuing further.
In that vein, I'd suggest that "wants to" is a stronger description of intent than actually happens with corporate patent filings.