You can see that it's Washington Post, well-known both for its ideological bent and its owner, as is generally the case for all major news outlets. As I see it, you should (1) use it understanding that; (2) pick other major news publications whose biases your prefer, and/or (3) find outlets that you find to be neutral, understanding that they're probably small and you should keep knowledge of them to yourself, lest they should become very successful and thus worthy of being bought or steered into something you don't like.

If you read the entire paragraph it says the normally annual report was delayed for three years, by Trump. We now get to see it for the first time.

How could you explain why the report is novel without explaining the delay?

Why?

It is from a newspaper, Washington post, which had entirely anti Trump news leanings for years. It’s very obvious the items and quotes they choose to include here while offering almost no new information on climate. Excluding Trump, this article could have been written 20 years ago.