A remote operator can manage dozens of such sites, a single "local" person might be close to one point, but the next control point is going to be miles away, so you either need much, much more people to station one at every valve, or have a situation where flipping a switch in all the "sites" is very slow because requires the "local" person to drive many miles visiting each location.
No, there's a reasonable objective need for this management to be actually remote - there's a discussion on how this should be implemented in a secure way, but it does have to be remote.
And then a sliding scale of risk and cost of getting hacked vs savings and increases in efficiency resulting from remote access.
Are you for or against Tesla having remote access to all of the Tesla vehicles? Are their OTA updates innovative or reckless?