Too much focus always on the “hackers” and never the obvious security lapses solved by diverting executive pay to more bodies and training to cover them, but oh well right?
Too much focus always on the “hackers” and never the obvious security lapses solved by diverting executive pay to more bodies and training to cover them, but oh well right?
What reason would we have to blame the company for poor security hygene? what possible outcome could we hope for when in 2021 nearly every Solarwinds customer renewed their license after the hack.
Please.
There is no shortage of labor for jobs paying high 6-figures … :-)
> Once they received the payment, the hackers provided the operator with a decrypting tool to restore its disabled computer network. The tool was so slow that the company continued using its own backups to help restore the system, one of the people familiar with the company’s efforts said.
It's hard to get the full story from a single article, and larger publications like the Washington Post tend to focus on the most recent statements from federal agencies and corporations rather than details that you and I find more interesting. Sometimes I wish that newspapers would do more of a synopsis of news stories a month or so after the fact to give more context and "lessons learned" or "what impact has this had?". I would prefer that much more to the "breaking news" approach.
[0] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-05-13/colonial-...
I'd wager a guess that their current IT team was worked to the bone on profit-focused projects, but will be 100% blamed internally by the execs.
It's almost like this arrangement was by design...
No one cares about that type of work that’s why. It’s ridiculous but true.