Solar + hydrogen is just as predictable as nuclear. It costs roughly twice as much (because of 50% loss on electrolysis and back), but ends up providing a stable power output independent of weather.

It’s conparable in place to nuclear if I’m not mistaken, and it’s fault scenarios are less severe.

Especially in US, with vast amounts of deserts, it seems like a no-brainer.

(having said that, climate change is so urgent that I’d say do whatever it takes to get to zero emmissions - be it nuclear or solar)