Really good article.

One point I do disagree with is this:

It is better to deliver 20 projects with 10 bugs and miss 5 projects by two days than to deliver 10 projects that are all perfect and on time.

You never actually have such a choice, but if one did exist I'd pick 10 perfect on-time projects. The problem is I don't know what the 10 bugs are. While I'd like them to all be typos in the footer of the contacts page, they could also be data corruption or a password leak.

If I had ppl that delivered on time with no bugs, but at half the speed, it then becomes my job to do a good prioritizing the projects such that the half we do are the right half. I think the constraint of being half as fast might even force us to make better choices.