On the enterprise side, it's much much worse. AFP is heinous. Their kerberos implementations are painful.
They actually have checkboxes in OS X server config screens that say: "Prevent man in the middle attacks? Yes or No?"
On the enterprise side, it's much much worse. AFP is heinous. Their kerberos implementations are painful.
They actually have checkboxes in OS X server config screens that say: "Prevent man in the middle attacks? Yes or No?"
As for kerberos, that is painful on any platform. At the moment at work I am trying to figure out why Mac OS X takes 10 minutes to connect to a Windows Server 2003 based file share, all I see with Wireshark is a bunch of Kerberos stuff being thrown around, whereas Windows clients connect without issues, but without ever attempting to use Kerberos.
anyway, hope you figure out the problem. :)
I don't really understand the point of OSX Server beyond possibly render farms (for music / movies)
Small businesses, because they are very easy to manage.
More importantly though, Mac imaging. You can't run DeployStudio on anything but a Mac running OS X Server. So if you have more than 5-10 Macs to manage, having an OS X server around is a no brainer. It doesn't cost much and it makes managing & imaging Macs as simple or simpler than PCs. This is by far its most legitimate use.