"Just ignore the lidar in situations where lidar and vision conflict and you have the original decision."
Then why have lidar? If it's only purpose is to agree with vision or you just discard it, then why even have it?
Then why have lidar? If it's only purpose is to agree with vision or you just discard it, then why even have it?
You might want to not have sensor B to lower the cost (as I suggested). Or you might want to have both sensors A and B because the provide some synergies (as gkop pointed out, better range of view, increased confidence, etc.). But it’s definitely not enough to just argue that the sensors may conflict.