One of the ways in which the “Fake News” term is earned is by taking inconsequential individuals like Youtubers with 30 followers or random Tweets and forming a “people are saying” narrative out of them.
The article is more than just the headline. They did a lot of reporting, and it's an interesting article. Apparently Google changed their search tool to hide the fact that some terms are blocked. (I actually think that would be a better hook for the article, rather than report on small youtubers leaving the platform).
Characterizing it as "fake news" because the headline is more general than it should be is really doing a disservice to public discourse. That would make almost all news "fake news", and I think we should reserve the term for articles that actually spreads lies, and not apply it to articles where the text doesn't quite live up to the headline. The term for that is clickbait.
It doesn't matter that it is "technically correct", what matters is that they are intentionally spreading misinformation. I think it is ok to be harsh against everyone who intentionally spreads misinformation.
Headline: Scandal makes long term Dreamer give up Dream
Sally who has dreamed of becoming a movie star for 10 years now stopped chasing the dream after the latest hollywood scandals.
Sally: There is no way I would have stopped dreaming if not for theses scandals, the situation is really bad!