The vast majority of these protesters are expressly non-violent. They camp to bring public attention to injustice. Some stay past curfew, deliberately practicing civil disobedience. They anticipate being gassed, maced, shoved, dragged, and otherwise abused by police -- and do so without retaliation.
Of course, there can be other actors with their own agendas. Some looting. Some rioting. However, it does us a disservice to blindly clump those practicing civil disobedience with those practicing violence, or to write about the former as if they were enacting violence, when the opposite is true.
Civil disobedience is a term that I don't equate to many of the violent actions that they are engaging in.
The protesters that are peaceful early in the evening are not the ones being arrested, pepper sprayed, etc...
The protesters that stay past midnight and assault the police are.
The notion that the "vast majority of protests are peaceful" is irrelevant, because the police actions we are talking about are against the violent protesters.
If group accountability is a thing, why only for one side?
e.g., https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/neo-nazi-proud-boys-groups-p...
https://m.startribune.com/medical-examiner-who-did-autopsy-s...
Power. It being completely hypocritical means nothing to them. The romans conquered Europe, even though they were surely told that they wouldn't like it if they themselves were invaded.
It's Floyd's fault, he was minutes from death's door, wheezing and barely hanging on to life, when the police showed up and tried to extend his life by kneeling on his neck, but he was too ill and he passed away as if by coincidence