I am some what confused by this being called dystopian. As more and more Westerners call for people being canceled due to a small but vocal minority on Twitter and other platforms, wouldn't this design play right into that? Rather than wasting time defending Twitter, the reasonable social justice warrior would simply petition the sympathetic State functionary to flip the bad-person's Internet connectivity. For example, right now people are trying to silence Candice Owens. Rather than doing that publicly, all they would need to do is find someone within the network admins that agrees and shut her off like Duysak did to Trump's Twitter.

This kind of social reform would be made all the more effective due to the fact that the wrong-thinkers would not be able to personally connect to any of their Internet based accounts. Sure, they could still use the debt card to get cash, or their credit card to spend, but only in the physical world. People could easily track the wrong-thinkers and shout them out of restaurants. They couldn't connect to Amazon, Walmart, or even Costco. They would ever increasingly be forced to capitulate to the right-thinkers, or, more appropriately, the Neo-liberal betters.

This is not dystopian, this is the way it should be. The original designers of the Internet failed to see how many people would fall out of line with the common, known truths. We should take this page from the Chinese and thank them for their leadership. We all know that no right is absolute. We also know that the wrong-thinkers, because they are in fact wrong thinkers, need guard rails on their speech. We need to use this plan to limit the 1st US amendment, and the equivalent EU laws. Otherwise wrong-think will prevail. People will believe they have the right to autonomy and free thought. They don't. They have the right to think what the Neo-liberal thinkers think. There is no land between these sides. All else are fascists.