1. QT is cross platform.
2. QT not moving away from pure C++.
C++ apps always been more responsive than java swing and electron.
2. QT not moving away from pure C++.
C++ apps always been more responsive than java swing and electron.
Afterwards go learn how to create a GUI for macOS, iOS, Android, ChromeOS, Windows, WebOS (as shipped by LG) or even Fuchsia, using only their SDKs and nothing else.
As for Qt not moving away from pure C++, go use it with pure C++ on iOS, Android and embedded devices.
Maybe you will get it, but I am not so sure.
Please see this commend by Ivan,
https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/s0mhf/qt_5_moving_away...
> Afterwards go learn how to create a GUI for macOS, iOS, Android, ChromeOS, Windows, WebOS (as shipped by LG) or even Fuchsia, using only their SDKs and nothing else.
Why use native SDK when there is QT?
The same can be said for Java. Why use Swing when there is native SDK?
Ahahhaa
The way you treat C++ is unfair.
Java is only part of Android OS SDK, you are the one bring Swing into the picture.
WHAT MAINSTREAM OS HAS QT ON THEIR SDK?