Also, I see the M1 as having 1733 (single) and 7652 (multi) GeekBench score, whereas the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U has 1414 (single) and 8140 (multi), so the M1 is quite faster in single core than it (22%) and close in multi-core (the AMD being 6% faster).
So what gives, and how does that fits with the numbers given by the grandparent?
The day it hits an over the counter SoC that can be used with open source software, i'll start to get excited...
Until then, i'll just use AMD Ryzen and Intel or straight up open source capable arm SoC
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/Apple-M1-8-Core-3200-MH...
I'd say AMD is really blowing the M1 laptops out of the water at half the price and more performance.
Many OEMs don't really give a good thermal headroom for the AMD processors, and only Lenovo seems to have done it right.
Lenovo's stock management sucks though. There were no stock for many days, and had to go unorthodox methods to get my hands on a unit.
It's remarkable that AMD can even compete despite not having access to 5nm like the M1 does.
I'm very excited for the near future of 5nm AMD laptops. Even more for 3nm.
It's nice to see the CPU space heating up in recent years.
(edit: Not precision, is inspiron.)
edit: wow price went way up actually - I paid $790 https://i.imgur.com/aBamY5l.png
Where? The only 5850U laptop I can find is the HP EliteBook 845 G8, and that starts at over $2300 for a 5850U model.